junio 27, 2013

youtube-dl roto

En caso de que youtube-dl les estuviese dando error

Name : youtube-dl
Version : 2013.05.14
Release : 1.fc18

[youtube] Setting language
[youtube] 5iabyEebfCc: Downloading video webpage
[youtube] 5iabyEebfCc: Downloading video info webpage
[youtube] 5iabyEebfCc: Extracting video information
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 162, in run_module_as_main

"_main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 72, in run_code
exec code in run_globals
File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl/

exec code in run_globals
File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl/_main__.py", line 18, in
File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl/youtube_dl/__init__.py", line 603, in main
File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl/youtube_dl/FileDownloader.py", line 461, in extract_info
File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl/youtube_dl/InfoExtractors.py", line 96, in extract
File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl/youtube_dl/InfoExtractors.py", line 617, in _real_extract
KeyError: 'sig'

Lo más fácil es un
sudo youtube-dl -U
Saludos, Casep!

2 comentarios:

  1. IMO I really hate doing this.(Me maintainer)

    If one can update the package by himself, I think we should drop this package in the repo. Updating such packages is painful, because the upstream can release a version everyday, but we cannot promise push every update to people everyday.

  2. Christopher, hi:
    First of all, thanks!
    Second, we *do* need the packages, first, luckily I've enough time to poke around reporting bugs (this one I reported it on Fedora's bugzilla and youtube-dl's git), but most don't, so for all those counting with the proper updated rpm it's a good thing, a very good one; secondly I'm kinda lazy I need those to install easily a lot install most of my software ;), finally I'm pretty sure doing that "sudo thingy" it's too complicated for my mom, for instance. So, yes, I think we do need the packages.

    So, thanks again, and please let me know if there's any way I can help you.